Net Zero or Zero Emissions

A net zero target. That will save the world.

What a load of rubbish.

Initially the believers were pushing for zero emissions. That was the only way to save the world … and make some money.

Then there was the idea of a price on carbon to save the world … and make some money.

Then there was a carbon tax to save the world … and make some money.

The most recent ‘scam’ was released by the ‘believers’ in 2018. Net Zero emissions. This would save the world … and make some money.

Net zero, unlike zero, does not reduce anything. This plan allows for the countries who agree to the scam, to pollute as much as they want, as long as they agree to offset that pollution with non pollution or pollution absorption devices by a certain date. For example, Tasmania have met net zero emissions requirements before the idea was thought up. Back in 2014, Tasmania’s hydro schemes and abundant tree growth, met the net zero requirements, Tasmania was polluting less than … whatever the other things in Tasmania were doing at the time. At that stage, they met the future net zero requirements.

Putting this basically, net zero allows any country who falls for this scam, to pollute like crazy up until an agreed date, then they must show offsets to account for that pollution. If they don’t, they pay the penalty … whatever the penalty is, to whom ever is the collector.

Just think about that for a moment. If you don’t meet the imagined target, you must pay a penalty. That’s the master plan right there. The pollution is not the overriding factor … it’s the money.

Joe Biden and John Kerry seem to have appointed themselves as the leaders of this scam.

In a fit of panic, Australia had to do something. Then, out of the blue, just before the ‘world skype hook-up’, Scott Morrison, for some reason, presented Hydrogen as Australia’s valuable solution to meet net zero requirements by 2050. Hydrogen, like windmills and solar panels, costs more to implement than what is saved. Hydrogen replacement for fossil fuels is not viable. It can’t be easily transported. To export it as a form of energy is not economical. Hydrogen is simply not the answer to solve the imagined problem.

Up until this recent ‘hydrogen game changer’ the Australian Federal Government did not have any Net Zero Emission Target. This allowed the greens and other uneducated specimens to becomes victims of government inaction.

But the facts are very different to the alarmism. Every state and territory in Australia has implemented Net Zero targets. The Federal Government don’t need to do anything, apart from tell the rest of the world they care.

Why the ACT needs to be different to all others in unknown, but we know that people in the ACT are different.

Net Zero is not the only crazy obstruction laid on the general public or believers, the Renewable Energy Target is another ‘scam’ to allow ‘victims’ to be sucked in. If this ‘target’ was vitally important, why are there so many variables that distract from the end result. New South Wales and Western Australia don’t even have a ‘target’. And once again, the ACT want to be the first.

This almost looks like some states are taking this seriously, until the final aim of this target year is seen.

The ACT and SA are aiming at the same amount but at different times. NT, Qld and Vic will only be halfway there by their target date. Tas will be way ahead due to Hyrdo Energy, the same energy generation system that the Greens will not allow anywhere else. But on their island, which is full of their type, it’s fine. NSW and WA don’t care.

This ‘target’ rubbish is simply that … rubbish.

On the 20th April 2021, on Mars, NASA ran an experiment that operated fantastically. They managed to extract oxygen from carbon dioxide (Mar’s atmosphere is 96% Carbon Dioxide) This little experiment, about the size of a toaster, produced enough oxygen to sustain an astronaut for a few hours daily.

This may be where Scott Morrison’s ‘target plan’ has some use. If Hydrogen is added to the oxygen you get H2O … water.

But it is still hard to imagine how oxygen could be a money maker for someone, unless an evil plan is devised. All that is needed is a gullible public, a great advertising campaign, a bunch of experts and a handful of unknown scientists. Then you will get an explanation about how owning this devise will remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere … saving the world. Even if you are smart enough to realise this is a scam, no worries. You will be given one, with the extortionate cost added to your taxation or energy bill. Scotts hydrogen plan will have been dropped. Your device will not produce water, you are already paying someone for that privilege.
However, all is not lost. If you are in a drought prone area, you will be offered the deluxe model at a slightly higher cost. It will also produce water.

But remember, this achievement will not be announced if it cannot produce more money than the scare itself.